|
BOOK OF THE DAMNED
By Charles Fort
CHAPTER: 01,
02, 03,
04, 05,
06, 07,
08, 09,
10, 11,
12, 13,
14, 15, 16,
17, 18,
19, 20,
21, 22,
23, 24,
25, 26,
27, 28
NOTES and Queries, 7-8-508:
A correspondent who had been to Devonshire writes for
information as to a story that he had heard there: of an occurrence of about
thirty-five years before the date of writing:
Of snow upon the ground -- of all South Devonshire waking up one
morning to find such tracks in the snow as had never before been heard of -- "clawed footmarks" or "an unclassifiable
form" -- alternating at huge but regular intervals with what seemed to be the
impression of the point of a stick -- but the scattering of the prints --
amazing
expanse of territory covered -- obstacles, such as hedges, walls, houses,
seemingly surmounted--
Intense excitement -- that the track had been followed by
huntsmen and hounds, until they had come to a forest -- from which the hounds had
retreated, baying and terrified, so that no one had dared to enter the forest.
Notes and Queries, 7-9-18:
Whole occurrence well-remembered by a correspondent: a badger
had left marks in the snow: this was determined, and the excitement had
"dropped to a dead calm in a single day."
Notes and Queries, 7-9-70:
That for years a correspondent had had a tracing of the
prints, which his mother had taken from those in the snow in her garden, in
Exmouth: that they were hoof-like marks -- but had been made by a biped.
Notes and Queries, 7-9-253:
Well remembered by another correspondent, who writes of the
excitement and consternation of "some classes." He says that a
kangaroo had escaped from a menagerie -- "the footprints being so peculiar
and far apart gave rise to a scare that the devil was loose."
We have had a story, and now we shall tell it over from
contemporaneous sources. We have had the later accounts first very largely for
an impression of the correlating effect that time brings about, by addition,
disregard and distortion. For instance, the "dead calm in a single
day." If I found that the excitement did die out rather soon, I'd incline
to accept that nothing extraordinary had occurred.
I found that the excitement had continued for weeks.
I recognize this as a well-adapted thing to say, to divert
attention from a discorrelate.
All phenomena are "explained" in terms of the
Dominant of their era. This is why we give up trying really to explain, and
content ourselves with expressing. Devils that might print marks in snow are
correlates to the third Dominant back from this era. So it was an adjustment by
nineteenth-century correlates, of human tropisms, to say that the marks in the
snow were clawed. Hoof-like marks are not only horsey but devilish. It had to be
said in the nineteenth century that those prints showed claw-marks. We shall see
that this was stated by Prof. Owen, one of the greatest biologists of his day --
except that Darwin didn't think so. But I shall give reference to two
representations of them that can be seen in the New York Public Library. In
neither representation is there the faintest suggestion of a claw-mark. There
never has been a Prof. Owen who has explained: he has correlated.
Another adaptation, in the later accounts, is that of leading
this discorrelate to the Old Dominant into the familiar scenery of a fairy
story, and discredit it by assimilation to the conventionally fictitious -- so the
idea of the baying, terrified hounds, and forest like enchanted forests, which
no one dared enter. Hunting parties were organized, but the baying, terrified
hounds do not appear in contemporaneous accounts.
The story of the kangaroo looks like adaptation to needs for
an animal that could spring far, because marks were found in the snow on roofs
of houses. But so astonishing is the extent of snow that was marked that after a
while another kangaroo was added.
But the marks were in single lines.
My own acceptance is that not less than a thousand one-legged
kangaroos, each shod with a small horseshoe, could have marked that snow of
Devonshire.
London Times, Feb. 16, 1855:
"Considerable sensation has been caused in the towns of
Topsham, Lympstone, Exmouth, Teignmouth, and Dawlish, in Devonshire, in
consequence of the discovery of a vast number of foot tracks of a most strange
and mysterious description."
The story is of an incredible multiplicity of marks discovered
in the morning of Feb. 8, 1855, in the snow, by the inhabitants of many towns
and regions between towns. This great area must of course be disregarded by
Prof. Owen and the other correlators. The tracks were in all kinds of
unaccountable places: in gardens enclosed by high walls, and up on the tops of
houses, as well as in the open fields. There was in Lympstone scarcely one
unmarked garden. We've had heroic disregards but I think that here disregard was
titanic. And, because they occurred in single lines, the marks are said to have
been "more like those of a biped than of a quadruped" -- as if a biped
would place one foot precisely ahead of another -- unless it hopped -- but then we
have to think of a thousand, or of thousands.
It is said that the marks were "generally 8 inches in
advance of each other."
"The impression of the foot closely resembles that of a
donkey's shoe, and measured from an inch and a half, in some instances, to two
and a half inches across."
Or the impressions were cones in incomplete, or crescentic
basins.
The diameters equaled diameters of very young colts' hoofs:
too small to be compared with marks of donkey's hoofs.
"On Sunday last the Rev. Mr. Musgrave alluded to the
subject in his sermon and suggested the possibility of the footprints being
those of a kangaroo, but this could scarcely have been the case, as they were
found on both sides of the Este. At present it remains a mystery, and many
superstitious people in the above towns are actually afraid to go outside their
doors after night."
The Este is a body of water two miles wide.
London Times, March 6, 1855:
"The interest in this matter has scarcely yet subsided,
many inquiries still being made into the origin of the footprints, which caused
so much consternation on the morning of the 8th ult. In addition to the
circumstances mentioned in the Times a little while ago, it may be
stated that at Dawlish a number of persons sallied out, armed with guns and
other weapons, for the purpose, if possible, of discovering and destroying the
animal which was supposed to have been so busy in multiplying its footprints. As
might have been expected, the party returned as they went. Various speculations
have been made as to the cause of the footprints. Some have asserted that they
are those of a kangaroo, while others affirm that they are the impressions of
the claws of some large birds driven ashore by stress of weather. On more than
one occasion reports have been circulated that an animal from a menagerie had
been caught, but the matter at present is as much involved in mystery as ever it
was."
In the Illustrated London News, the occurrence is
given a great deal of space. In the issue of Feb. 24, 1855, a sketch is given of
the prints.
I call them cones in incomplete basins.
Except that they're a little longish, they look like prints of
hoofs of horses -- or, rather, of colts.
But they're in a single line.
It is said that the marks from which the sketch was made were
8 inches apart, and that this spacing was regular and invariable "in every
parish." Also other towns besides those named in the Times are
mentioned. The writer, who had spent a winter in Canada, and was familiar with
tracks in snow, says that he had never seen "a more clearly defined
track." Also he brings out the point that was so persistently disregarded
by Prof. Owen and the other correlators -- that "no known animal walks in a
line of single footsteps, not even man." With these wider inclusions, this
writer concludes with us that the marks were not footprints. It may be that his
following observation hits upon the crux of the whole occurrence:
That whatever it may have been that had made the marks, it had
removed, rather than pressed, the snow.
According to his observations the snow looked "as if
branded with a hot iron."
Illustrated London News, March 3,
1855-214:
Prof. Owen, to whom a friend had sent drawings of the prints,
writes that there were claw-marks. He says that the "track" was made
by "a" badger.
Six other witnesses sent letters to this number of the News.
One mentioned, but not published, is a notion of a strayed swan. Always this
homogeneous-seeing -- "a" badger -- "a" swan -- "a"
track. I should have listed the other towns as well as those mentioned in the Times.
A letter from Mr. Musgrave is published. He, too, sends a
sketch of the prints. It, too, shows a single line. There are four prints, of
which the third is a little out of line.
There is no sign of a claw-mark.
The prints look like prints of longish hoofs of a very young
colt, but they are not so definitely outlined as in the sketch of Feb. 24th, as
if drawn after disturbance by wind, or after thawing had set in. Measurements at
places a mile and a half apart, gave the same inter-spacing -- "exactly eight
inches and a half apart."
We now have a little study in the psychology and genesis of an
attempted correlation. Mr. Musgrave says: "I found a very apt opportunity
to mention the name 'kangaroo' in allusion to the report then current." He
says that he had no faith in the kangaroo-story himself, but was glad "that
a kangaroo was in the wind," because it opposed "a dangerous,
degrading, and false impression that it was the devil."
"Mine was a word in season and did good."
Whether it's Jesuitical or not, and no matter what it is or
isn't, that is our own acceptance: that, though we've often been carried away
from this attitude controversially, that is our acceptance as to every correlate
of the past that has been considered in this book -- relatively to the Dominant of
its era.
Another correspondent writes that, though the prints in all
cases resembled hoof marks, there were indistinct traces of claws -- that
"an" otter had made the marks. After that many other witnesses wrote
to the News. The correspondence was so great that, in the issue of
March 10th, only a selection could be given. There's "a" jumping-rat
solution and "a" hopping-toad inspiration, and then someone came out
strong with an idea of "a" hare that had galloped with pairs of feet
held close together, so as to make impressions in a single line.
London Times, March 14, 1840:
"Among the high mountains of that elevated district where
Glenorchy, Glenlyon and Glenochay are contiguous, there have been met with
several times, during this and also the former winter, upon the snow, the tracks
of an animal seemingly unknown at present in Scotland. The print, in every
respect, is an exact resemblance to that of a foal of considerable size, with
this small difference, perhaps, that the sole seems a little longer, or not so
round; but as no one has had the good fortune as yet to have obtained a glimpse
of this creature, nothing more can be said of its shape or dimensions; only it
has been remarked, from the depth to which the feet sank in the snow, that it
must be a beast of considerable size. It has been observed also that its walk is
not like that of the generality of quadrupeds, but that it is more like the
bounding or leaping of a horse when scared or pursued. It is not in one locality
that its tracks have been met with, but through a range of at least twelve
miles."
In the Illustrated London News, March 17, 1855, a
correspondent from Heidelberg writes, "upon the authority of a Polish
Doctor of Medicine," that on the Piashowa-gora (Sand Hill) a small
elevation on the border of Galicia, but in Russian Poland, such marks are to be
seen in the snow every year, and sometimes in the sand of this hill, and
"are attributed by the inhabitants to supernatural influences."
CHAPTER: 01,
02, 03,
04, 05,
06, 07,
08, 09,
10, 11,
12, 13,
14, 15, 16,
17, 18,
19, 20,
21, 22,
23, 24,
25, 26,
27, 28
|
